Subject	Bernie is right. Unless you need crazy gripping needs like
Posted by	Milo (San Antonio, TX.) on August 07, 2003 at 11:31 AM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	You don't need either. (n/m) posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on August 07, 2003 at 10:16 AM
Message	that in autcross racing or track running this probably isn't the clutch for you. Not to mention the ugly feel that is associated with shifting on a puck clutch. Hit us some of the classifieds, plenty of options avail. I went with a RPS clutch personally. Good luck.
Follow Ups	What is the difference between a 4 puck and 6 puck clutch? - Stickeefingerz 02:27:02 08/07/03 Reply to your question.. - xxbulovax91xx 03:08:22 08/07/03 Does it really matter which clutch u get? - Malukalu99 08:00:23 08/07/03 2 pucks (n/m) - Spee 08:02:23 08/07/03 pucker factor (n/m) - Janders 10:07:33 08/07/03 Well. The civic engine (of course being a 4cyl) has - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 10:09:12 08/07/03 You don't need either. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:16:56 08/07/03 2nd, unless you track, then you may want a 6-puck. - BigTDogg 10:35:48 08/07/03 "track" = dragstrip. (n/m) - nixit 11:48:50 08/07/03 I was under the impression they were good for autocross also - BigTDogg 12:05:09 08/07/03 Hardly. AutoX is all about smooth, linear driving. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 13:21:20 08/07/03 Sold. So would carbon carbon be overkill if my goals are: - BigTDogg 13:33:40 08/07/03 RPS MAX/Street is rated at 600 ft.-lbs. of torque. - ibrandt 14:12:53 08/07/03 Bernie is right. Unless you need crazy gripping needs like - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 11:31:18 08/07/03 Neither "grips" more... - ibrandt 14:00:48 08/07/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.